Skip to main content

Making the Budget Process Effective

For many of us in the Finance world, “budget season” is a meaningless measurement of time because we always seem to be in the middle of working on The Budget. Whether we’re looking at capital requirements for the next one, three, five, or even ten years out, planning head counts, or building pro formas, finance professionals spend a considerable amount of time planning for the future. Unfortunately, our prognostications rarely hold true. As actor-director-writer extraordinaire Woody Allen once said “if you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.” With all the time spent on planning and sharpening the pencil just to miss the mark, why do we even bother with budgeting? 
As always, the reality is clouded in shades of grey. No business can truly operate for long without some semblance of a plan. Try taking your latest app idea to the angels of Silicon Valley promising your potential investors that they’ll get their money back “eventually”. Ultimately, we’re forced to admit that planning, in some shape or form is a necessary evil. 

So, how can we make it more effective?
I propose that it’s time we start to look at budgets as a playbook for how to operate our business over the coming year. Where many organizations set aspirational goals and impose those down on the operations teams to achieve and exceed, we should be looking at the budget as a guide on what the company can achieve given any possible scenario. If you’re in logistics and a major hurricane threatens the Gulf Coast, how will you get your client’s cargo to it’s final destination. And what will you do if 60% of the country’s oil refineries are offline and you cannot get fuel or your fuel prices surge? That one disaster has multiple impacts to your grand plan.
How can an organization plan its budget around multiple scenarios without turning the budget season into a budget year?
1.) Drivers-Based Budgeting - a budget should be based on some set of drivers. A driver-based budget is easily updated, and because it’s easily updated, multiple scenarios can be run in relatively short order. For instance, if you set your sales budget based on units sold and average price per unit, you can easily change either of those variables and create a new sales budget in a matter of minutes. Going back to the earlier example of escalating fuel costs, if you know, roughly, how many miles your trucks drive on an annual basis and what your average fuel economy looks like, then you can easily research historical fuel price trends and run sensitivities on high fuel prices and low fuel prices. Almost instantly, management can get an idea of the impact of a major risk on the operation and work on contingency plans.
2.) Partner-up. Bring operations into the budget discussion and allow them opine on budget targets. This isn’t to say that managers, who may be compensated in part on their ability to meet or exceed budget, should set their own budgets. However, Finance should listen to the operations team to understand what kinds of risks and opportunities may exist in the operation, and Finance can assign values to those risks and opportunities. Going back to the first point, using a drivers-based model, Finance can apply a single risk item to the model and generate a new pro forma for management. Sometimes, a risk isn’t worth mitigating or thinking too much about, and sometimes exploiting an opportunity requires making changes which have negative ramifications to the qualitative aspects of the business (e.g. guest satisfaction, investor perception, etc.).
3.) Draw a line in the sand. As a team, decide what is important for the organization and build your plans around those virtues. If you want to grow revenues, develop some key assumptions and plans around how to achieve that growth and then end the discussions. You cannot have the perfect plan, but you can get 80% of the way there. I have been a part of some organizations that continuously drag out planning to the point where budget truly is a full-year exercise. If you spend the whole year planning, it leaves no time to execute. Will there be major changes to the underlying assumptions between planning and execution? Maybe, but the point I’m trying to make is that you need to set a baseline and then develop some base contingency plans based on a few possible scenarios.
4.) Execute and adjust. In line with #3 above, set the financial objectives of the company, assess the risks and opportunities, and then execute as planned. As the year unfolds, evaluate progress against the business objectives. I recommend reviewing progress quarterly for two reasons: a.) because it takes time to ramp up execution on plans, and b.) it gives the organization enough time to evaluate and adapt to where it is on the range of expected results. If the company is on the low-end of projections, management can decide if there are external factors (e.g. poor economy, high producer costs) or internal factors (e.g. ineffective training, ill-conceived logistics) affecting execution and pull out the contingency playbook developed during budget season.
I am not suggesting that we don’t push our organizations to achieve a little bit more than they have in the past, but rather, let’s use the budget to recalibrate objectives and goals and determine what the company can really achieve.
What are your thoughts on the budget process? Does your organization utilize the budget to plan out execution, or is your budget process simply a target setting exercise? What have been some effective budgeting techniques you’ve utilized in the past?


  1. When invited to turn out to be OJO A-listers, players 온라인카지노 get a refund on all bets with limitless payouts. Registered players also obtain daily kickers, which assist them earn more rewards and enhance in degree the more they play. Unlocking ranges means more bonus spins for video games and the OJO Wheel, nicely as|in addition to} cash prizes and more. If you’re one of the scores of Wildz players who likes to win money on the go, we’ve made every effort to make sure your expertise is slick and clean.

  2. Terry Noffsinger’s legal staff grasped the similarities, going so far as to convey on board Sharon Y. Eubanks, an lawyer 코인카지노 with the West Virginia law firm Bordas & Bordas. Eubanks was the lead counsel for the Justice Department in successful federal litigation towards the tobacco industry between 2000 and 2005. She joined Noffsinger in representing Stacy Stevens after he satisfied her that the deception used by the playing industry paralleled that of the tobacco industry. “The tobacco and playing industries are basically working from the same playbook, using highly engineered merchandise to hook customers,” Eubanks says. For many playing addicts, the zone itself turns into extra fascinating even than profitable.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Game of Data - A Story of Muffins and Metrics

I’ll begin this post with a confession: I don’t have the best dietary habits (though I swear I’m working on it). My office has a self-service cantina stocked with a variety of foods including candy bars, soft drinks, frozen meals, and, stored in a round wicker basket, the most addictive muffins on the planet. Many mornings, despite my best efforts, I cannot fight the urge to grab my $1.80 muffin from downstairs before plowing into the depths of spreadsheets and ad hoc reports. It’s an addiction, but at least it’s not crack… right? Addictions and self-control aside, nothing frustrates me more than when that little wicker basket is empty when I’ve already committed to quenching my muffin madness. What’s even more frustrating is when I see the vendor’s truck parked outside the loading dock and the rep inside the cantina early in the morning only for the muffin basket to be empty… again. I should take that as sign that it’s time for me to squash my sweet tooth once and for all, but

Explaining Variances

As FP&A professionals, we’re tasked with relating the story of the business to the numbers in the P&L. Often, however, the story has many twists and turns that can be hard to break down. Seeing average cost per unit rising drastically over a short period of time can be alarming, but breaking it into the component (i.e. rate, volume, mix, etc.) can help us understand whether the change is a matter of poor management or favorable shift in business volume.   One of my favorite ways to present variance analysis is by breaking the variances down to their components – or drivers. For instance, in a manufacturing scenario, your drivers of expense might be wages & benefits, material costs, and hours worked. I’ve broken such a scenario down for you below which can explain the approach.   In this scenario, a manufacturer ran production for an order of one of its products   Budget Production Cost $73,000  Actual Production Cost $71,100  Cost Higher/(Lower) ($1,900)   On the surface, p